Last night at open volleyball, one of our regulars asked John if he could say a few words before prayer. His comments were meant to encourage us to go out and vote today. “I’m not telling you who to vote for,” he said, “just go out and vote. Vote for righteousness.” I thought of all the slanderous tv commercials and other broadcasts during this race, and I wondered to myself, is it really possible to vote for righteousness? is there a righteous candidate?
Now, I don’t mean to criticize our friend. He was extrememly well-meaning, and I agree with him that we all ought to excercise our right to vote. But I am a little discouraged. Not only does it seem that all the political parties stoop to mud-slinging and propaganda, but I live in a district where my vote will likely make no difference–I am severely outnumbered. When my alarm went off early this morning, I asked myself, is it really worth it? Will my one measly little vote make any difference at all? Then my own words haunted me awake: I believe every American should excercise his right to vote regardless of political position. I believe neglecting to vote is an abuse of our God-given privilege in this great nation. So rare is this right, that we are fools to consider it anything less than a responsibility or to take that responsibility lightly. My own words convict me, and I regret not taking this election and every other election I’ve been eligible to vote in more seriously. So, this morning, John and I dragged ourselves out of bed and down to the local elementary school and cast our ballots. We voted because this is a crucial election. We voted because we can.
Amen. Chloe and I have a long drizzly walk in store for us to get to our polling place but it’s totally worth it. Just think how few would vote if everyone thought his vote didn’t count!
By: Alicia on November 7, 2006
at 5:55 pm
Good job Ruth. The media here in WY has been running poll numbers that show my choice for Governor severely behind. Plus “the other guy” has all the big WY endorsements (NRA, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, the print and broadcast media…; though my guy does have Nat’l Right to Life).
However, this seeming approval deficit further motivated me. Maybe, just maybe, more people would look at the issues rather than the charisma (though I feel that my choice for Governor even has more of that than the incumbent). In addition to that, there are some other close and highly competitive races.
I proudly cast my vote this morning and am now praying that the best candidates will win. May people realize the importance of voting, regardless of what the opinion polls say about their preferred candidates.
By: Scott on November 7, 2006
at 7:19 pm
Glad you voted, Scott. You too Ruth and John. I just got back from the polls and I am glad to have choices and have a part in this election. It was a temptation for me too to skip this election. Working in the County Clerk’s office makes me pretty tired of the whole thing. But….. I went and I’m glad I did. We have some tough races in Washakie County – Sheriff, Commissioner, Attorney. We’ll be here in the office until 10:00 pm waiting for the results. It is fun since we get it first here. I’ll be posting the results as soon as we get them. Isn’t America Grand!!!
By: Frani on November 7, 2006
at 7:41 pm
[...] Third, congrats to Ruth Valiante, her husband John, and others like them for going out and voting today, no matter what the chances are of their candidates winning. May our tribe increase! [...]
By: Congrats! « Political Cowboy on November 7, 2006
at 7:54 pm
what if you can’t vote for righteousness because all the candidates are unsavory? Also, what do you do if you know nothing about a candidate? Do you just vote party line (I’m thinking more along the lines of politics at the local level). I did not feel that I could make an informed vote about our judges (about 20 of them) so I just left it blank in the ballot. I would feel guilty if I helped put a scoundrel in office because I wasn’t able to thoroughly research all the judicial positions.
By: Matthew Johnson on November 7, 2006
at 11:51 pm
Matthew, that’s my point. I don’t think it was possible, at least not in my district, to vote for “righteousness.” I’m no political expert, but it seems to me that there were very few if any “savory” candidates. I don’t know if my outlook is right or not, and I don’t want to turn my blog into a political debate; but I voted for what was in my opinion the lesser of evils–we’re talking about politicians here.
By: Ruth Valiante on November 8, 2006
at 1:54 pm
I always have a tough time on judicial retentions. Also on trustees. This year I was able to find some info from the state bar for retentions which helped some. On trustees (which, like judges are non-partisan) I came across some interviews in the local paper which helped there. For positions that I had no idea, I filled in the oval by the blank and wrote-in my buddy, Abstain.
By: Scott on November 9, 2006
at 9:18 pm